Archive for the 'SEO' Category

List of Google PR 10 Websites

Wednesday, April 30th, 2008

Google logo
Google Page Rank (10/10)

Do PR 10 websites really exist? Yes, they do, and here’s a short sample of them:

http://www.google.com (of course)
http://www.adobe.com/
http://www.w3.org/
http://www.macromedia.com
http://www.energy.gov
http://www.nasa.gov
http://www.nsf.gov
http://www.whitehouse.gov
http://www.real.com

Google has awarded at least 100 or more sites awarded the distinguished PR 10 status. Yahoo!, however, is not one of them. It’s interesting how Google gives its top competitor only a 9 of 10, when clearly Yahoo is far more prominent than any of the other 10 PR sites. In fact, Alexa still ranks Yahoo! still the most popular website in the world, not for searches, but because of how much other content it has. Maybe Google is a little too stubborn to admit that.

Google Page Rank Update Rewards ‘Timely’ Links

Wednesday, April 30th, 2008

Google logo

Google performed another Page Rank (PR) update on Monday, April 28, 2008. Some websites’ PR went up; others went down.

PageRank is Google's Measure of the importance of this page (-10/10)!

With this update, I noticed a possible favoritism Google lended to newer links from social media sites. One of my websites has 10,000 incoming links, but no ‘fresh’ links from coverage in the social news media in recent months. The result of this last PR update was that site was taken down a notch in the PR rating.

Meanwhile, I had two smaller websites receive PR increases with fewer, but newer links. The news content and links were published to Digg and other social news websites. Delicious, Stumble Upon, and other social bookmarking sites were utilized, along with a presence in the blogosphere in more in recent weeks and months. RSS feeds were used along with a Wordpress blog and forum posts. These sites connected through the social media were impacted positively in the PR update- each moved up two notches on the PR scale. Not bad.

My hunch is that Google’s algorithm was tweaked to include more ‘timely’ link activity- especially valuing social news, bookmarking, PR newswires, and other sites showing reliably fresh content.

Edit Wikipedia and Increase Traffic

Sunday, April 27th, 2008

Wikipedia Editing

Wikipedia is simply a massive website that generates a significant volume of traffic. Since Wikipedia can be edited by anyone, why not edit it to your advantage?

If you run a business, your first step is to give your business its own dedicated Wikipedia page. Write text in a manner to make your page sound ‘noteworthy’. There is much Wikipedia content that doesn’t deserve its own pages, I wouldn’t worry about your site not ‘fitting in’. For instance, just for Star Wars, there are pages dedicated to Star Wars bounty hunters, fictional planets, and silly irrelevant controversies like ‘Han shot first’. If fiction deserves a page, surely you can make a strong case that your real-life business deserves its own recognition.

When you’re writing, make sure you include all of your business accolades and your own biography, if you’re the business owner. Sometimes newly submitted Wikipedia pages get deleted and sometimes they stick. If it gets removed, there’s nothing wrong with trying and retrying. One of my Wikipedia pages has been up for 2 years- and is successfully inter-linked with other pages in Wikipedia. That should be your goal.

My most successful Wikipedia edit was placing an external link to my website on a PR 7 page. This link is still there and brings about 600 visitors a month to my external site. If your link is actually relevant and provides value to the page, then it won’t get removed for link spam. And once your link survives a critical initial time period of a month or so, it may fall off the radar for some editors prowling to reverse people’s changes.

As far as the value of the external link itself, sure, the link has the ‘no follow’ attribute and in theory shouldn’t pass along any PageRank (PR) value to Google. However, the link still delivers good traffic and some SEO professionals argue that Google still favors being linked to from Wikipedia, even though it goes unreported.

One nice side-effect of being linked to from Wikipedia is you get a lot of incoming links from other Wikipedia clones. Especially nice for a new website, you can get a lot of incoming links in short order, by simply placing one on a popular Wikipedia page and having it ’stick’. Since the Wikipedia content is in the public domain, other websites are free to copy to make their own websites and often do. So, what happens is you end up getting not just a link from Wikipedia, but every other Wikipedia clone. It can add up. A newly created website from summer of 2007 now has more than 400 incoming links from various Wikipedia clone sites. That’s a nice way to get a website off the ground, in terms of initial link building.

Take advantage of Wikipedia. Just because they have the ‘nofollow’ attribute doesn’t mean we should give up posting relevant, meaningful, external links. And if your page and/or link gets removed, try modifying to make the page more educational and more relevant and re-submit. Persistence will pay off. Eventually, you’ll find Wikipedia can be very good to you.